What should we teach about disability? National consensus on disability competencies for health care education.

BACKGROUND: Health care providers are unprepared to meet the health needs of patients who have disabilities. Disability training is needed, yet there is little agreement about what should be taught. OBJECTIVE: Establish a national consensus on what healthcare providers across disciplines need to know to provide quality care to patients with all types of disabilities (e.g., mobility, sensory, developmental, mental health). METHODS: People with disabilities, disability advocates, family members of people with disabilities, disability and health professionals, and inter-disciplinary health educators systematically evaluated and provided feedback on a draft set of disability competencies. Based on this feedback, competencies were iteratively refined. RESULTS: After two waves of feedback, six competencies, 49 sub-competencies, and 10 principles and values emerged that addressed topics such as respect, person-centered care, and awareness of physical, attitudinal, and communication health care barriers. An overwhelming majority (89%) agreed or strongly agreed that the disability competencies reflected the core understandings needed to provide quality care for patients with disabilities, were relevant across disability types (85%), and across health care disciplines (96%). Averaging evaluative feedback across competencies, participants reported that the competencies were important (98%) and clear (96%). CONCLUSIONS: This consensus on what to teach is an important milestone in preparing a disability competent health care workforce. Future directions for research, training, and policy are discussed. When disability is included in health care education, the health care workforce will be prepared to deliver accessible, patient-centered, quality health care to patients with disabilities.

Getting comfortable with disability: The short- and long-term effects of a clinical encounter.

BACKGROUND: Physicians report discomfort when interacting with patients with disabilities, which can negatively impact the quality of healthcare they provide. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: An intervention structured around a formative clinical encounter was assessed for its effectiveness in changing comfort towards treating patients with disabilities. It was predicted that this encounter would have a positive short- and long-term impact on medical students. METHOD: During the 2017-2018 academic year, 169 third-year medical students conducted a patient encounter with a person who had a disability. Students met individually with the "patient" and completed a brief social and medical history as if they were meeting a new patient to establish care. A measure of perceived comfort caring for patients with disabilities was administered to students before and after the encounter. One year after the patient encounter, 59 students were surveyed about their satisfaction and the impact of the patient encounter. RESULTS: The impact of encountering people with disabilities in a clinical setting was positive, with statistically significant improvements across all items on the measure of perceived comfort. Students were highly satisfied with the experience and anticipated feeling more confident, more comfortable, less awkward, and more skilled and efficacious when encountering a person with a disability in their future practice. A thematic analysis of the one year follow-up data suggest that students valued the encounter and desired more content on disability throughout their education. CONCLUSIONS: Medical education should include dedicated exposure to persons with disabilities and a simulated patient experience allowing for a safe environment to gain skills and confidence.

Implementing Living Independent From Tobacco With Dyads of People With Disabilities and Their Caregivers: Successes and Lessons Learned.

People with disabilities have more health complications and higher healthcare utilization related to tobacco use than people without disabilities. Yet, they are less likely to use tobacco cessation resources. Important to meaningful and lasting health behavior change are relationships developed in the home, workplace, and community. Some people with disabilities rely on paid and unpaid caregivers. Just like people with disabilities, paid caregivers are more likely to use tobacco, creating a unique opportunity to target smoking cessation to people with disabilities and their caregivers. Living Independent From Tobacco (LIFT), an evidence-based tobacco cessation intervention, was implemented with dyads of people with disabilities (n = 5) and their caregivers (n = 7). Qualitative analyses revealed that participants valued the dyadic approach and the opportunity to learn coping skills to help with smoking cessation. Lessons for offering inclusive health promotion interventions to people with disabilities and their caregivers are discussed.

Living Independent From Tobacco reduces cigarette smoking and improves general health status among long-term tobacco users with disabilities.

BACKGROUND: People with disabilities disproportionately use tobacco and suffer associated negative health consequences. Research is needed to explore tobacco cessation programming for people with disabilities to counter these health disparities. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the impact of Living Independent From Tobacco on tobacco use, knowledge and attitudes about tobacco use, coping skills, and perceived health status among people with disabilities. We also assessed participants' subjective impressions at post-test. METHODS: Living Independent From Tobacco was evaluated via train the trainer model at three Midwestern sites serving people with disabilities. Outcomes were assessed at four time points: pre- and post-test (n = 30), and again at 1-month (n = 26) and 6-months (n = 13). RESULTS: Long-term tobacco users with disabilities significantly reduced tobacco use from pre-test to post-test (p = 0.003), and, compared to baseline, this reduction continued to be significant 1-month after the intervention (p = 0.02). From pre-test to post-test, perceived health status significantly improved (p = 0.0001). No significant changes were observed across time points for knowledge and attitudes about tobacco use nor for coping skills. Qualitative data revealed the importance of coping skills to mitigate the negative effects of nicotine withdrawal. Peer accountability was also noted as an important source of motivation for tobacco cessation. CONCLUSIONS: Data from the present study provide evidence for the short-term effectiveness of Living Independent From Tobacco to reduce tobacco use and improve health status among people with disabilities. Qualitative data revealed the importance of coping skills and peer accountability to support tobacco cessation. Implications for tobacco cessation programming for people with disabilities are discussed.

Chronic Disease Self-Management Program in American Sign Language: Evaluation and Recommendations.

The Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) is an evidence-based program that is affective in managing chronic conditions and improving health outcomes in diverse populations; however, the program may not effectively reach the Deaf community. Deafness is associated with chronic health conditions and low health literacy, making a health education program such as CDSMP a good fit for this population. This study adapted and evaluated CDSMP in American Sign Language (ASL). The aims of this study were to (1) adapt the CDSMP curriculum for Deaf participants; (2) evaluate the program fidelity, participant satisfaction, and qualitative feedback; and (3) provide recommendations for improving the accessibility of CDSMP for the Deaf community. We evaluated the CDSMP program offered by lay leaders in ASL to Deaf participants. Program fidelity and participant satisfaction were high (93% and 88.9%, respectively). Qualitative feedback from participants and lay leaders informed implementation recommendations. Based on these findings, we offer 10 recommendations for offering CDSMP to the Deaf community. This study demonstrates that CDSMP can be successfully offered in ASL to Deaf participants with minimal adaptations. Offering CDSMP in ASL to accommodate Deaf learners promises to improve health outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Evidence for the Fidelity and Effectiveness of Living Independent From Tobacco for People with Disabilities and Their Caregivers.

People with disabilities (PWD) are more likely to use tobacco and less likely to access tobacco cessation programs compared with people without disabilities. Living Independent From Tobacco (LIFT), an evidence-based intervention designed for PWD, was piloted with dyads of PWD (n = 5) and their caregivers (n = 7). As an important source of practical and social support for PWD, caregivers also impact health-related attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of PWD. Caregivers who smoke may unwittingly interfere with cessation efforts of the people they support. We found that LIFT could be offered to dyads of PWD and their caregivers with fidelity. The intervention was associated with increased use of coping strategies and self-efficacy to reduce smoking. Tobacco use decreased at post-test (-34.94%), with further reduction 6-months after the intervention (-50.60%). Implications for offering inclusive health promotion interventions to both PWD and their caregivers are discussed.

A global health training model for teaching pediatric clinical decision making skills to Rwandan physical therapists: A case report.

Background and Purpose: There is increasing interest among physical therapists from high-income countries to participate in education development projects in low-income countries. However, there are few examples in the literature of effective developmental models or projects. This case report describes a model for improving pediatric clinical decision making skills among Rwandan physical therapists using best practices in clinical decision making, evidence-based practice where possible, and use of the International Classification of Functioning and Disability (ICF) model. Case Description: A 48-hour continuing professional development course based on the pediatric section of the Advancement of Rwandan Rehabilitation Services Project (ARRSP) was presented to 66 Rwandan physical therapists in the form of classroom lectures, laboratory and case study practice, and clinical visits to the course participant's work place. Interactive teaching and learning was emphasized. Outcomes: Course participants completed a pre- and post-course assessment addressing course content. There was a 53% improvement in post-course assessment scores. A post-course evaluation eliciting participants' confidence in eight clinical decision making skills emphasized in course material was also administered. Comments were strongly positive (92%) for the value of clinical visits in reinforcing the participant's new clinical skills. Discussion: This case report documents a global health continuing professional development project that improved pediatric rehabilitation knowledge and clinical skill confidence. The project incorporated sustainability by soliciting both input and involvement of the target audience from start to finish; from the needs assessment to classroom teaching. Building on these two aspects promotes a sense of ownership and longevity.